Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Deconversion
  • Secular Grace
  • Critique of Apologetics
  • Podcast
  • Episodes
  • About
  • Contact

Critique of Apologetics

The field of apologetics is an attempt to justify faith with reason, evidence and argumentation. Ostensibly, apologetics exist to convince non-believers. In practice, the consumers of apologetics are already believers, those looking for modern justifications for their subjective experience.

In my deconversion story, apologetics had the opposite effect of their intent. As a believer, I realized the apologetic arguments I consumed were insufficient. That even though I accepted the conclusions by faith, the arguments themselves were either fallacious or weak. Along with the bible itself, apologetics formed the first cracks in my faith.

I am not a philosopher, nor do I pretend to be one. My critiques of apologetics are from the perspective of an honest seeker. It is my opinion, that it is not that believers take their faith too seriously, it is that they do not take it seriously enough. And that believers in general and apologetics specifically use one standard of evidence to judge other religions as false and then use special pleading for their own. My goal is to have a single standard to judge all religious claims.

I also do not believe that intellectual arguments lead people to faith and very few lead people away from faith. What does allow people to listen to their doubts and in some cases walk away from their former faith? Brutal honesty. Honesty with oneself and honesty about one’s justifications for belief.

Rather than an intellectual contest,

I want to have an honesty contest.

Critiques of Apologetics:

  • Thought experiments for believers
  • What if I grant you that?
  • Apologetics, epistemology and moving on
  • Watershed Presuppositions
  • Leaning into my presuppositions

What disappoints me about apologists is not that they are making arguments for Christianity.
I expect and encourage that.
What disappoints me is that the arguments are weak.

From Apologetics, epistemology and moving on

While I am occasionally angry at professional apologists, I am not angry at believers. How could I be? I used to be one.

  • I was mistaken
  • The bubble
  • Magic feathers and sugar pills
  • Why I am not an Anti-Theist

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Tumblr
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
Widgets

Categories

  • 20 Questions With a Believer
  • Adverse Religious Experiences
  • Agnosticism
  • Artists
  • Atheism
  • Authors
  • Autonomy
  • Blog Posts
  • Bloggers
  • Book Review
  • Captive Organization
  • Comedy
  • Communities of Unbelief
  • Critique of Apologetics
  • Deconstruction
  • Deconversion
  • Deconversion Anonymous
  • Dones
  • doubt
  • ExVangelical
  • Hell Anxiety
  • High Demand Religious Group
  • Humanism
  • Jehovah's Witnesses
  • LGBTQ+
  • Missionary
  • Mormonism
  • Movie Review
  • Musicians
  • Naturalism
  • Nones
  • Philosophy
  • Podcast
  • Podcasters
  • Post Theism
  • Purity Culture
  • Quiver Full
  • Race
  • Religious Abuse
  • Religious but not Spiritual
  • Religious Trauma
  • Secular Community
  • Secular Grace
  • secular grief
  • Secular Humanist Graces
  • Secular Therapy
  • skepticism
  • Spirituality
  • The Bubble
  • Thought Experiments
  • Uncategorized
  • Unequally yoked
  • Volunteerism
  • YouTubers
  • Follow me on Twitter
  • Follow me on Facebook
  • Follow me on Instagram
  • Follow me on YouTube
  • Apple Podcasts
  • Google Podcasts
  • Spotify
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • gracefulatheist.com
    • Join 133 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • gracefulatheist.com
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: